The Verb Form Numbers system is quite
old, going back to the earliest European Arabic grammars such as that of
Guillaume Postal, Paris, ca. 1538 and Pedro de Alcala' ca. 1613. Their order of numbering is the same as that which
we are familiar with today. Another grammar was published in Rome ca. 1622
which uses the numbering system but has forms II and IV switched. Erpenius'
grammar was only superseded in 1810 by the grammar of De Sacy, who used the
same system which has been in vogue ever since. Incidentally, the numbering
system was also used in older grammars of Hebrew, but seems to have fallen out
of usage.
The system, an extremely useful mnemonic
device is not entirely unrelated to the traditional work of صَرف,
for it follows the order of المجرَّد
and المزيد .The
use of numbering, however, is the Latin, European innovation which might have
been a claque on some aspect of the study of Latin grammar. At the very least,
it is well known that Latin grammar traditionally numbers the different classes
of conjugation. De Sacy is careful to make clear in his presentation the verb
forms that they fall into groups of
المزيد بحرف ، المزيد بحرفين، المزيد بثبلثةِ حُروف
1.
فَعَلَ دَرَسَ 6. تَفاعَلَ تَراسَلَ
2. فَعَّلَ دَرَّسَ 7. إنفَعَلَ إنقَلـَبَ
3. فاعَلَ شاهَدَ 8. إفتَعَلَ إرتَفَعَ
4. أفعَلَ أقبَلَ 9. إفعَلَّ إحمَرَّ
5. تَفَعَّلَ تَحَدَّثَ 10. إستَفعَلَ إستَخدَمَ
Furthermore, each transitive
pattern has an automatic passive counterpart where the stem short vowel Fatha
and Kasra are replaced by Dhamma and Kasra.
No comments:
Post a Comment